NSLC Test

Show Navigation
  • American University
  • Columbia University
  • Duke University
  • Georgetown University
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Northwestern University
  • UC Berkeley
  • UCLA
  • University of Miami
  • Virginia Tech
  • Yale University
  • 2022 Summer
    • American University
    • Duke University
    • Fordham University
    • Georgetown University
    • Georgia Tech
    • Johns Hopkins University
    • Northwestern University
    • UC Berkeley
    • UCLA
    • University of San Diego
    • UPenn - PennVet
    • UT Austin
    • Yale University
  • All Photos
    • All Galleries
    • Search
    • Cart
    • Lightbox
    • Client Area
back to search results
Prev Next
Info
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
x

Studio Project Final Review

The Architecture students gathered to present their studio projects to a panel of four judges. Nicole Bass, Julia Andor, and Colt Brock spoke to students earlier in the day about their organization, The American Institute of Architecture Students, and served as two of the judges along with Program Director Ms. Ziesing. Each group had ten minutes to present project inspirations, thought processes, complications, sketches, and physical models of their proposed project. Following the presentations, the judges gave students feedback on elements that either worked or could be improved.

Download
Filename
NSLC-07062023-40.jpg
Copyright
Chandler Carlisle for the NSLC
Image Size
4480x6720 / 17.5MB
Studio Project Physical Model Presentation
Contained in galleries
Session 2
The Architecture students gathered to present their studio projects to a panel of four judges. Nicole Bass, Julia Andor, and Colt Brock spoke to students earlier in the day about their organization, The American Institute of Architecture Students, and served as two of the judges along with Program Director Ms. Ziesing. Each group had ten minutes to present project inspirations, thought processes, complications, sketches, and physical models of their proposed project. Following the presentations, the judges gave students feedback on elements that either worked or could be improved.